Joe Biden is Anti-Rape and Murder but Pro-Dependency

How brave and courageous is Joe Biden?  I think most breathing people will agree, Joe Biden flirts with the line between fool and buffoon on a daily basis but this latest riff connecting the lack of Republican support for Obama's new spending spree to a rise in rape and murder is simply assinine.

This is the tired lie of the left, to say government agencies will solve the ills of society.  The left floats the fairytale that the bigger the government, the better, safer, happier your life will be.  The truth is, just the opposite is the result of big government but the Joe Bidens of the world would never let on to this.  Big government does one main thing, it removes the responsibility for self and shifts it to a faceless, mindless entity.  This entity has no personal connection or concern for the individual other than needing the votes of these multitude of dependents to retain big government's power and to continue to grow in it's inefficency and moral void.  Spoiler alert, this strategy does not end well for "the individual" or "the people".

The welfare rolls and entitlement programs have grown exponentially under Obama/Biden which is a more valid connection to rising crime rates than lack of police presence yet Biden blames Republicans for the rise in crime.  When a person is stripped of personal responsibility, handed the necessities of life and told the government can do for them what they are not equipped and never will be equipped to do for themselves, that in itself is a death sentence to a soul.  When "stuff" is handed to anyone with no expectation of repayment, there is something vital that dies within.  As handouts become the norm, the end result is a person robbed of dignity poised to rob others in return.   

In contrast, when a person, not government, helps out another person, somewhere down the line, the person initially helped feels obligated to return the favor.  When the favor is repaid, the person retains their dignity and feels empowered.  This basic human exchange is lost whenever government steps in as the broker.

Let's pretend for a moment that more money for more police would solve the crime problem.  I would have no problem with government funding this however, the reality is our government takes our money and uses it for unwarranted, unrealistic, unworthy things.  Time and time again we hear of millions if not billions of American tax dollars squandered, wasted and yes, stolen by our government.  This is why I do not trust government to use my tax money to improve society.  The track record cannot be denied.  One word, Solyndra.

However, back to Joe's argument for Obama's "Job Bill", it's this spending mentaily which enables the broken system of dependency to continue.  This is the cause of rising crime rates, not the lack of police funding. Through the deceitfulness of a Socialist-style regime, more people are being enslaved into the "Hope and Change" of the Hopelessnes of one's abilities and Chains of permanent dependency.
 
If Joe Biden was genuinely serious about bringing the crime rate down he would be honest with the people he claims to want to protect.  He would tell them the truth, that government does not make them better, safer or happier.  He would clue them into the secret that their own God-given talents and sheer determination will serve them and lift them up more readily than government ever could.  He would tell them that their neighbor is more dependable than the government and if your neighbor helps you, you are to return in kind.  He would tell them that no system is perfect and unfortunate things do happen in every human-run society.  Government is not all powerful, never will be and never should be depended on to make all things fair.  Every Socialist experiment proves this out. 

The left is interested in one thing, controlling the masses and keeping the most amount of people under a blanket of dependency of sub-par neccessities.  No where in the world has the left been successful in lifting vast numbers of people out of poverty but the left does a marvelous job of keeping everyone equally poor and miserable.  Though the message of the left feigns fairness, since when is lack of self-determination and self-responsibility fair?

Fact, the largest percentage of people live above poverty levels in a Capitalist society than in any other societal structure the world has ever experienced.  Fact, cronism exists in Capitalism which is unfair but it is light lunch compared to the cronism existing in the Communist and even Socialist systems of the world.

At the end of the day, Joe's outrage at the Republicans is farcical.  The rapists and the murders are not swayed by a couple of dollars thrown at a police department.  They are swayed by bringing them up in a society that holds them responsible for their own livelihood, that retains their dignity of self, that expects greater things of them than a Socialist/Communist government expects of them.  Socialism/Communism has no faith in the human being's ability to do for self and reminds said human being of this on a daily basis.  Joe may rail against rape and murder but pushing the dependency on the drug of big government upon the masses, for him, is no crime.

Careful Joe, whom you condemn.  At this point your ticket needs every vote it can get.  With rants like your latest, the future rapists and murderers may stay home instead of voting this next go 'round. 

     

What's In A Name?

Following my recent posting entertaining the idea of Donald Trump as America's next president, I had an interesting conversation with my mother.  I had not gotten her take on "The Donald" before my post but was pleased that her sense of him was the same as mine. 

For anyone who knows my mother, she has been, is, and will always be a person who shoots from the hip.  99.999% of the time I've found her instincts about people to be dead on (at times, to my dismay).

She had thought through the Donald Trump notion to the point of already picking his perfect running mate, that being Col. Allen West, Florida's new Republican Congressman from the 22nd district.  My mom made the case why West would be the ultimate compliment to Trump with West's stellar military service and calm, easy confidence that only a first rate military man is graced with.  The gravitas of this combination would be overwhelming.

The more I thought of this ticket, the more I too believed in it's brilliance.  A Donald Trump/Allen West ticket would reduce an Obama/Biden ticket to little more than Tweedles Dee&Dumber.  The final selling point for me came when I looked up the meaning of both men's names.  Having a brother named "Donald" I was aware of it meaning "great chief".  The word "trump" in the dictionary had several variances of meanings all denoting a win with a trump along with one definition stating trump being a dependable and exemplary person.  So far, so good.

Upon looking up the name "Allen", it too was promising with the simple but poetic meaning of "ROCK".  "West" seemed obvious with it's directional relation to America being the epitome of all things "west" however a certain definition amongst the directional citings jumped out at me.  The definition stated "west" as meaning the noncommunist countries of Europe and America.  I suppose I always assumed that when the term "west" is used but the fact "noncommunist" is specifically used has greater weight in this "progressive" climate of "change" more than ever.  Further down, "west" also relates to the liturgies of or relating to the Roman Catholic or Protestant segment of Christianity.  Coincidence?  That's for Republicans to pick and America to decide.

If there's truth in a name, and Republicans choose two men to run in 2012, one who is a GREAT dependable CHIEF capable of winning over any card played matched with a ROCK that exemplifies all things noncommunist, the Republicans will take the White House and America will take a huge sigh of relief as she is released from the shackles of progressive bondage and restored to being the country where men live the bold ideals of self-responsibility and self-determination once again.   

What the Facts Is on the Taxes

Every time I hear a politician or pundit on the left characterize the extension of the Bush Tax Cuts to the "wealthy" as a cost TO THE GOVERNMENT, I cuss a blue streak.  Until the day comes that all citizens have skin in this government funding game, I will remain one foul-mouthed broad.  Sorry kids, keep covering your ears! 

I agree in the concept of taxes to pay for the infrastructure of our country, not a problem but when you read about tax dollars going for items such as studying the sexual arousal in anesthetized female rats (real Dartmouth study with our real tax funding), research and development regarding the use of African-American English, or $168,000 going to Escape Massage Parlor in Midlothian, Virginia, a taxpayer has to wonder how these recipients are worthy of our tax funds?!  Of course, it's always the policemen and firemen whose funding will be first on the chopping block.  Heaven forbid sexy drugged up rats should not have their fun! 

Please, all politicians, cut the crap.  We've delivered our shot across the bow.  For the next two years we will be watching every move you make.  No pulling fast ones on us anymore because we've got your number. OR do we?  Regrettably just this past election I am afraid the crafty politicians scammed the voters of Virginia once again.  Though we were able to oust a few of the weasels this last round, the good people of Virginia made a very bad mistake.  We fell for yet another tax scheme and this one was backed by REPUBLICANS.  Shocking, I know.  NOT.

Two of the three initiatives on Virginia's ballot involved changing our state's Constitution to reduce the taxes of (1) our elderly and (2) our military.  Who wouldn't WANT to give tax breaks to elderly and the military?  Seems like a "no brainer" however the fact is as Rob Schilling http://www.facebook.com/schillingshow noted in his pre-vote warning against these initiatives: ANY CITIZEN EXEMPT FROM PAYING TAXES THAT HIS NEIGHBOR MUST PAY, HAS NO INCENTIVE IN KEEPING THE TAX LOW BECAUSE HE HIMSELF PAYS NONE.  With 2009 showing 47% of ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS paying ZERO Federal Tax, we are setting ourselves up to either run all successful individuals out of the country or render them extinct all together.  The Progressive Tax has brought on the predictable instability that all ponzi schemes produce.  To ADD to this by voting for tax breaks on the elderly and military are only bringing financial collapse to our system all the quicker.  Playing on our emotions is how these thieves always strip our pockets and in the long run, both elderly and military will suffer too. 

As for the third initiative, it too sounded like a good idea...increasing the funding for the state's rainy day fund.  In these days of financial insecurity, the concept of putting money away for emergencies seems right in line with every responsible person's ideals.  WRONG!  Giving more money (our money) to the state to hold for a rainy day is equivalent to asking an arsonist to tend the BBQ.  The state is not a bank, investment fund or a savings account.  The state is not regulated to spend that money per your request.  It has full control in deeming any rainy day it wants as an emergency, and with politicians made of sugar, you know EVERY drop of dew will magically become classified a hurricane by our sweet representatives.

Even though American citizens are undoubtedly waking up and becoming informed, we still have quite a way to go.  Don't be fooled.  Whether it be a Democrat or Republican, if they suggest you give them more money, there's a very good chance it is funding the arousal of rats at the Escape Massage Parlor in Midlothian, VA.

Think twice when governments entice.