Digital Nativity

For those of you who haven't already seen this, I have to admit, it's quite clever regardless of your beliefs. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkHNNPM7pJA



Merry Christmas Wishes To All!

arva14

Is Obama A Fairy Godmother Or Fairy Hitman?

And with a swoosh of his magic wand-pen, all people can FINALLY execute their military missions without the huge burden of maintaining personal privacy.  Thank you Fairy GodObama.  This is such a milestone for humanity.  To think how improved military missions will be now that people can openly proclaim their preferences of penile insertion and vaginal stimulation.  AWESOME and oh so important to the job of defending our country. 

I shake my head at this high school drama playing out before me.  Are adults in our society so desperate for affirmation that they will settle for some piece of paper decreeing their personal lives are valid and worthy of announcing such to the immediate world?  Next thing you know, Michelle Obama will tell us that as First Lady, she feels she can only fulfill her duties by letting us all know she prefers bedding Obama on top with arugula on the side.  Since when exactly did a person's private sex acts define their ability to be a soldier, a teacher, a Senator, a First Lady? 

The juvenile rationale for this whole crap about serving openly gay is almost laughable if it weren't so serious for a myriad of reasons.  First and foremost, where does being openly gay fit within a combat setting, on foreign soil where civil rights are non-existent?  When the first openly gay soldier is taken prisoner and asked if he is a homosexual, will he be copping to the classification of "gay and proud" then?

The reality is, no openly gay personnel will be assigned to combat.  That deal was worked out long ago.  However, the fact remains, for our enemy, whether gays in the military are in battle or behind a desk is irrelevant and serves yet as another tool for them in recruiting young Islamist followers in their cause against the GREAT SATAN.  Already the Islamist websites are using acceptance of gays in our military to point out America's debauchery, lack of God's law and poisoned culture that must be defeated at all costs.

What sort of cultural victory has the repeal of DADT truly resulted in?  If the defining aspect of a person and their ability to pursue their career hinges on everyone's knowledge regarding the way they achieve the momentary effect of an orgasm, I suggest that individual has not emotionally matured past adolescence and shouldn't be driving a bus let alone wielding a firearm in combat. 

Much like the teens on Facebook who document every moment of their lives by tweets, profile updates and instant uploads of digital pictures featuring important subjects like picking their noses and feces shaped like Italy, the willingness to relinquish all personal privacy to the world is stunning.  

One has to wonder why the government is so keen on folks openly admitting their sexual practices?  Are the Socialists in our government, the people bent on a Utopian society, truly interested in promoting the validity of a gay lifestyle or is this some other means to a yet undefined end?  In all of the socialist, nationalist societies prior to Obama, the weeding out of deviants and the less productive members of the regimes own ranks were the first order of business upon coming to power. 

Could all this celebration of "sexual transparency" be just a tool to identify the "problems" within their ranks at a later date?  This is exactly what happened in Russia.  Homosexuality was decriminalized after the fall of the Czar only to be RE-criminalized under Joseph Stalin who also saw to it that abortion was criminalized as well.  Stalin said homosexuality was a far-right conspiracy even though the Communist Revolution "supported" homosexual rights in the beginning.  The sentence for having same-sex relations under Stalin was hard labor of at least 5 years.  These laws stayed on the books in Russia until the fall of the USSR.  And the dude hanging on Obama's Christmas tree, sweet, kind, old Mao Tse Tung wasn't a big fan of same-sex stuff either.

So as the gays in the military celebrate their new found public persona, I caution all about your Fairy Godmother.  This may be trite, but it is a saying that too often is right...Be Careful What You Wish For.  And even more careful whom it is granting it.

  

    

Being Openly Gay In The Military Does Not Equal Being Happy

Keeping up with liberal societal demands and politically correct mores is so difficult.  Women in the military are not to be distinguished as "female" soldiers.  They put their lives on the line just like their male counterparts and want to be addressed simply as "soldier", no gender recognition, please!  But if you are sexually attracted to your own gender then by all means, scream it from the rooftops...Gay soldier, gay soldier, gay soldier... at ease, Ms. Thing.

This whole false issue regarding gays in the military is not about fairness.  It is about diluting the effectiveness of our National Defense.  The left lives in the strangest world where constant self-contradictions really don't matter.  For instance, the left has professors in college classrooms declaring the power of human sexuality, how its effects on our actions and focus are overwhelming and most importantly, involuntary. 

I once had a professor show the class a still shot of an attractive girl just sitting there expressionless.  He asked students in the room to raise their hands if they found her physically pleasing.  Everyone, male and female, raised their hands.  Then he asked if anyone was sexually aroused.  One guy's hand shot up to a roar of laughter.

Next he showed a video of the same girl simply brushing her hair.  She was not doing it in any sort of seductive manner.  Her expression remained neutral as she simply sat there brushing her long dark hair.  The professor asked if anyone now was sexually aroused.  Several male students hesitantly raised their hands.  The video went from the girl with a neutral expression to the girl smiling as she brushed her hair.  More hands went up, including the professor's! 

He apologized for only stimulating the male segment of the class but his point was that the physical reactions to human sexual attraction are totally involuntary, proving the reason why sex sells.  Sexual attraction captivates your attention and takes you to another part of your brain without any effort or control on your part.

Before that experience I didn't KNOW males could be aroused by something as mundane as brushing my hair.  I will admit after that I never brushed my hair in public again.  The mere thought of some strange man having an involuntary sexual response to a non-sexual action truly grossed me out as a young woman.  Now I just laugh at how easily distracted males are by sex.

So, if I'm to take that liberal educator seriously, how can I honestly expect individuals to serve side by side in dangerous situations and deal effectively with physical reactions they have no control over?  In fact, if you've been a human being for any stretch of time (that means you liberals too), you will know that when a person "catches your eye" your focus, no matter what you are doing, changes.  Any traffic cop will attest to the fact that a large number of male drivers in single car accidents are caused by the male watching some girl walk down the street instead of focusing on driving.

On the other side of the gender spectrum, I've witnessed girls basketball teams completely come unraveled when their male classmates show up to watch them play in a game.  The boys' presence made the girls so nervous that a usually rock solid team became a bunch of fumbling, bumbling, giggling twits.  The amazing part was that none of the boys who came were love interests of any of the girls on the team.  They didn't have to be, the mere fact the girls knew these potential dates were there to observe them was enough to put the girls heads everywhere but the game.

Fact: Human sexuality plays a part on one's ability to focus no matter what your orientation.  If someone who is known to be sexually attracted to "your kind" is present, the dynamics change ever so slightly.  In a combat situation, slightly matters. 

Beyond this basic truth about human sexuality, what sort of person signs up voluntarily for the military in order to express their individuality?  Did you not get the memo?  Military service is not a career in the arts.  It's a mission that specifically requires all prospective soldiers to check their individuality at the door.  If a straight person enters the military demanding to leave their hair long and wear t shirts with slogans they personally believe in instead of the uniform fatigues because "that is who they are", they'd be booted out the door day one.

Recently a long serving soldier was indicted for not following orders and sentenced to three years in jail.  He refused to report for duty based on his personal belief that President Obama has not proven that he is an American citizen.  Under that belief, this career soldier did not see Obama's presidential order for him to return to Afghanistan as valid. 

Sorry dude, you are in the military, an order is an order and that is what you signed up for.  Your personal doubts about Obama's birthplace is not up for discussion in a military setting.  This soldier was expressing his political orientation yet his expression was rightly squelched.  As a private citizen he can think what he wants but as a soldier in the United States Military, such personal expressions are detrimental to military morale and chain of command.

Gay soldiers have been in the military since such service began.  Those that serve without needing the acknowledgement of their sexual orientation are the people who truly understand and respect the military mission.  That is why Don't Ask, Don't Tell is legitimate and fair.  The gay soldiers, however, who feel their mode of sexual act defines them to such an extent that it must be made known to all around them strike me as people with an agenda other than military mission success.

And what about the left constantly concerned about how we are viewed by the Muslim world?  Last time I checked, being gay is a grave sin within the tenets of Islam.  Muslims do not believe a person is born gay, they chose it.  In Iran, homosexuals are routinely executed.  I guess that is why Ahmadinejad so confidently proclaimed that they have no homosexual problem in Iran because they don't have homosexuals there.  You got that right Ahmie! 

And so the left trumps up this issue of supporting gay soldiers to serve openly as homosexuals with zero concern how the Muslim world will percieve this?  The left made sure female soldiers did not oversee the prisoners at Gitmo because having a woman oversee them was a personal affront to them.  Will the left see to it no gay soldiers oversee Muslim war prisoners as well?  Which side of that one will you chose oh all-knowing Marxist goons? 

The left is very sensitive to how our military behaves within the Muslim culture, except, I guess when it comes to acts considered by Muslims as sexually deviant and evil.  With this issue, the left brazenly ignores Muslim sensibilities because at the end of the day, the left could care less about Muslim sensibilities unless those sensibilities play into the Marxist goal of weakening America.  Intellectual consistency is not the left's forte and neither is their loyalty to the Islamic world or gays for that matter. 

All things considered, openly gay American military soldiers will result in either morale problems in combat units or an unwritten rule that the openly gay soldiers do not get assigned to combat situations.  As long as the United States Military is a volunteer force, the issue of openly gay soldiers serving is an intellectually dishonest, political leftist ploy meant to harm the United States Military, not enhance it.  That's not pro-gay, that's just sad.

How Liberal Cable Food Shows Can Save The Lives Of Endangered Capitalist Pigs

I took a break the other day from the rush of holiday preparations, Christmas choir performances and high school basketball games to simply chill and watch an innocuous food show.  I usually tune into some form of cable news but I'd had it with the Lame Duck Congress chatter and decided to hear about duck con fit and pancake batter instead.

I can't remember if it was a Travel Channel show or Food Network but the topic was the popular trend of Roach Coach food (as I call it).  The show profiled all the different food truck vendors who race around urban centers, developing a loyal following as they offer up some amazingly inventive and apparently profitable edibles.  Though the vendor's politics were not declared outright, the code words and homage given to our current Commander In Chief, made it clear these were young liberal adults long educated under the Marxist philosophy of Utopia Starts With "U".  Little do they realize the correct spelling is Youtopia and it actually begins with "Y"...would you willingly become a slave to the state?

Each young entrepreneurial idealist related their story of how they took their high level college degrees in finance, computer engineering and other obscenely expensive liberal arts endeavors and chucked them out the window for a chance to be in charge of their own destiny.  Hmmm, funny their tenure-soaked college professors didn't mention this option before the tuition checks were all cashed. 

One young man, almost giddy with glee, admitted he now spends close to 80 hours a week working in his food wagon, going on to clarify that it's a much more rewarding, fulfilling endeavor than that 40 hour-a-week office-Hell he left behind.  He boldly declared he would never go back.  Good for him! And actually, VERY good for us.

As I was pleased to hear the spirit of individualism still managing to exist in the hearts of those whose heads have been so thoroughly conditioned with the false realities of social justice, I had to chuckle with pity at these young unwitting individualists still attempting to please the masters of their empty ideology.  To a fault, each made a case for their obliging the rules of the new society by proclaiming the healthy, fresh ingredients they proudly serve up to the masses at reasonable prices. 

I'm sorry, but from what I saw going on in those trucks of good taste, Empress Michelle would never approve of the deep frying techniques, use of real butter and the much too generous portion sizes under her unquestionable rules of food rationing, no matter how much arugula you put on the side. 

The day will come and I believe soon, when these young idealists will recognize who they really are, the offspring of pioneers and free citizens, not the spawn of lowly worker bee serfs.  The veil of social engineering for the greater good will be lifted and these young Americans will then understand the warped realities they've been fed by tainted textbooks, patronizing professors and the lying bastards better known as progressive politicians (both on the right and left).

These callow "Yes We Can"ers will soon encounter the regulations of a socialist utopia that is sure to limit their menus, restrict their fuel allowances, increase their taxes, impose higher license fees, and wreck their dreams, rendering the operation of their business, regulation by regulation, an impossibility.  Of course, our benevolent government may well put them out of their business mercifully quick by squashing their innovations in one legislative swoop. 

Seriously, what's to stop our "know-what's-best-for-you" government from banning all street food, period?  Just like the once dependable fundraiser of the school bake sale and the standard first taste of entrepreneurial bliss, the neighborhood lemonade stand, in places famous for their allegiance to Michellism, government entities have deemed both practices too dangerous, too self-enterprising and too FUN to expose society-at-large to. 

Heaven forbid if any of our young liberal food pushing entrepreneurs give a toy away with their Mexican/Fusion Asian-vibed pulled pork rib burgers on the whole wheat bun!  Why, that's certainly grounds for child abuse in our new, improved, ivy-leagued approved socialist state.  Remember, introducing the concept of homosexuality to kindergartners in the classroom is fine.  In fact, it's the humane thing to do but don't you DARE give those impressionable tots a toy with their non-state sanctioned rationed sustenance.

It's this sort of idiocy that is catching up to the messaging of the left.  The reality of leftist doctrines use to have a big enough lag time that we all could take a step back from our capitalist vantage point on the hill with little recognition of where we actually stood.  Now however, with each step back, there's a noticeable shadow being cast, the shadow of the wall of Marxist "social good".  It use to be a wall far in the distance but now we are close enough that it's height is blocking out the sun.  More and more of us realize with each step back, our land of individual freedom has been eroding beneath our feet. 

We're at a very pivotal point now.  We''ve backed far enough that there's barely a ledge left to stand on.  Our back is up against the wall of Marxist thought.  The tree of liberty is next to us on this eroding cliff but it's roots are now exposed and things are not looking good.  We either go through the socialist gate in the wall and join the One World Land on the other side where personal property, personal responsibility, personal innovation and dreams are non-existent, or somehow utilize our tree of Liberty and construct a bridge, build a signal fire or swing from its branches back to the original land of Freedom we've been backing away from for several generations.

Many are saying it is inevitable that America will morph into socialism...that due to the predictions of chaos and economic troubles coming, the populace will cry out for government to save them.  Some say Capitalism will cease to exist in America within my lifetime.  I absolutely do not agree, and the liberal food truck, granola crunching, dream following, Obama-loving American youth are why. 

I believe there will always be those souls who do need an outside entity to lead them through the stages of their lives, who for one reason or another, perhaps a lack of intelligence, personal will, or possibly genetics, that deem these creatures incapable of survival by their own wits.  I witness the actions of the youths of Europe and I believe they have no innate desire to determine their own destiny.  I believe they have no confidence in their own abilities or those of their peers to make it on their own.  I believe they depend on the Government for their education, their livelihood, their determination of self-worth.   I believe this mindset is so deep seeded within their makeup that, though it pains me to say, based on the profile of their youth, I don't have much hope for the population of Europe to escape the trap of socialism within my lifetime. 

America however, is a different story.  No other country in the history of man has had such a concentration of individualists come together and build a society like the one forged in the first 100 years of the United States of America.  That spirit, though currently masked by materialism and trendy feel-good vapid liberal ideals, is still there in the blood of our people.  There is no other land where oppressed people with the necessary personal drive gene literally risk their lives to this day to come here.  Unlike China, whose people as a whole have never known personal freedom, there are simply too many young idealistic food truck owners, new immigrants and old conservatives that will never take that last step backward, through the gate of socialism and live on the other side of the Marxist wall.

It is true, our youth may ignorantly wear Che shirts and vote for a man who not only has a weak personal history but next to no knowledge of the history forged by the great country he now attempts to govern.  This is all an unfortunate reality but there remains the fortunate reality that the leftist brain trust is forgetting.  True, American youth are easily led via false compliments and by playing off the guilt of their privileged existences but at the end of the day, I truly believe the bulk of misguided American youth will part ways with their European counterparts due to what all Americans have in their bellies, the desire to chart their own destiny.

Like the young liberal food truck owner who tasted the shackles of a paper-pushing, "yes sir, Boss", 40-hour-a-week paycheck and spit it out to take a bite out of a self-determined, 80-hour-work-week slathered in personal satisfaction, this same mindset, that of the American pioneer, will ultimately resist the enslavement of socialism and build that bridge back to our birthright, the land of freedom, the land of the individual, the land of the Fat, Happy, 80-hour-a-week-working, perpetually innovative, Capitalist Pig.

Not only will America's Capitalist Pigs survive, I believe they will in fact, sprout wings and fly, reaching greater heights than we ever dreamed. And with that, I say OINK to the People!!!

Student Protesters Earn An F In Comprehension

A ten foot sign proclaims, WE ARE NOT YOUR SLAVES.  My dear callow, nanny-state-loving youths, that's exactly what you are.  In fact, the more you push for the warped ideals of socialism, the thicker the shackles, the shorter the chain. 

One peruses the leftist websites and the common opinion is clear, China's system is the goal of today's young socialists.  These very student protesters throwing tantrums, demanding services, actually think they are being cheated out of an education by the government.  They've been cheated out of an education, alright, an education based in reality and the way a society succeeds through individual innovation.   

STUDENTS!  What exactly have you been studying?  Try pulling this stunt in your beloved China where a student protester would be lucky if they were jailed for the next 30 years. Assuming they weren't shot on the spot, they'd be denied anything resembling a book to read during their detainment.  Study would be replaced with hard labor and no nice, comfortable dorm room but plenty of room mates to be sure. 

And what about the Chinese students who do as they are told and submit to the system?  Do you really think a Chinese student has the luxury of picking their field of study?  Do you really think a Chinese student has access to ideas about liberty and free thought?  Do you really think the Chinese government gives a crap if you peons don't want to be slaves?

STUDENTS!  Quit falling for the false compliments your reality-incompetent professors hand you.  I heard the same tripe 25 years ago from the social misfit, Mao-loving, mental-midget educators who depend on self-centered, over-indulged, intellectually stunted, Western youths to do their bidding. 

They shower you with concocted praise, pretending to elevate you above all non-academic adults, placing you at their feet in the tower of KNOW-IT-ALL U.  They promise to pass the baton of power on to you as long as you join them in the quest of the great society where the dumb will be taken care of and the intellectually elite will rule.  Little do you know that the "dumb" is actually you, the student.  Boy, will you be taken care of!

Here's a couple basic facts the youth of our world need to realize about an all providing Government:  Such a Government is not capable of providing life.  Such a Government is capable of providing death. Government sees people as masses not as individuals.  Government provides at the lowest quality of services for the most amount of humans.  Government will take more power from an individual, never less.  Government will reduce the human population to the most controllable levels for the Government.  Government's greatest threat is a thinking human.  Government must control all information passed amongst the masses.  Government can not allow for subversive thought to exist.

Masters provide, slaves accept.  As long as one's hand is out, one remains submissive no matter how loud one stomps and screams.  To be free of bondage, the slaves must reverse the flow of  provision and acceptance. 

The material giver will always rule the material taker.  This concept is foreign to today's youth.  They literally can not comprehend this truth.  And so the youths of Britain kick, scream, demand for the evil-Nanny Government to educate them further into dependence and mediocrity as the Chinese Government smiles.          

Julian May Have A Leakey Wiki But It's Not All His Fault

The charges being brought against Julian Assange are ridickulous but at the very least, poetic.  To think, the world's whistle blower, infamous for leaking potentially potent secrets is now in custody for leaking apparently impotent secretions from his own whistle.  The irony is stunning.  Shakespeare, eat your heart out!

The truly important symbolism does not stop there.  If America's security secrets are that vital and that precious, why would we set them up to be so easily tapped into?  Why? Because America has morphed into nothing better than some left wing, psuedo-intellectual, phony feminist, tramp.  With the reign of Obama we began behaving internationally just like the two idiots now claiming rape against the drippy geek they both willingly dropped their drawers for.

Julian Assange may well be responsible for the actual "act" but it's the slutty behavior and lack of personal responsibility that got us all here, including the two "ladies".  The fact is, the American chain of command sent our most valuable secrets to the party wearing a mini skirt and thong rather than a knee-length dress and chastity belt.  Why aren't there a slew of American military and other political leaders with their wrists in cuffs for this?  There should be!  The mere fact some dufus Private could down load what he did in the manner he did it is the truly criminal act.

America has lost it's sense of personal responsibility, replacing it with a false sense of approval awarded via meaningless Nobel Prizes and empty treaties with countries sensing our lack of self-respect.  Our country is no better than the two women who trot the globe calling themselves feminists, champion leftist causes as they claim superior ideals over the dumb masses.  Yet both "smart, savvy, worldly, feminists end up banged by some loser just like the uneducated trailer park waitress they despise and mock. 

These two Marxist mavens put out for a fellow lefty who uses them like meat and now they regret it?  Wow, that's progress!  How far the feminist movement has brought women, just like all leftist theories, they forget that human beings are the ones who are suppose to implement these Utopian lifestyles...GOOD LUCK FOOLS!

So here we are, trying to trump up charges against a low-life Internet worm who was even less well known than Obama three years ago yet this leftist weasel (I'm referring to Assange not Obama) can hold the world hostage with the threat of screwing us all because America chose to give away her common sense dignity for the cheap title of socialist party girl.

I am not blaming the victim here.  A victim is someone who is attacked without warning and without any means to have averted the attack.  Just like the two spreaders in Sweden, we saw Assange and any other of his ilk coming down the path years ago but did nothing but invite him in and rub up against his leg.  Our National Security secrets should have been ironclad instead we practically begged Fate to take advantage.  And Fate obliged.

Bottom line, Assange is an attention-seeking soul with bad intentions.  He is not a heroic do-gooder with the admirable goal of exposing the corruption of the world.  If that had been his real motive, he would have revealed all the evils as soon as possible regardless of his own fate for the world's benefit.  Instead, he's dribbled bit by bit, which up to this date really hasn't lived up to the promises.  He claims to have bombshells capable of taking down the world's infrastructure.  If so, is that the way to fix the world?  I thought the left was all about reform not execution? 

I think Assange is a sad little man with an enormous need to be powerful and important.  He may well have a bombshell.  Then again, like the wads he shot with the disgruntled groupies, it could be nothing but blanks.  I'd prefer not to find out.  Instead, I'd like President Obama to quit living out his personal Marxist fantasy and start protecting America's interests the way he protects his own college transcripts!

On second thought, maybe that's what is in Assange's leaks?  Hmmmm.

If It Weren't For God We'd Be Perfect Already!

With the discovery of an arsenic eating life form, the blogosphere is all abuzz declaring this finding once and for all proves there is NO GOD.  The NO GOD chorus was tuning up anyway since it's the Christmas season.  That's what they do this time of year to promote world harmony.  But this little alien microbe has them singing louder than ever before. 

Somehow, the NO GOD folks conflate this finding with the "in my image" statement, finding the one as disproof of the other.  First, the "in my image" part doesn't refer to physical make up, it's man's ability to think and reason that is in God's image but whatever, if this arsenic-munching bug makes the NO GOD folks happy, all I can THINK is, that's Humanist REASON for the Season. 

Regardless of their glee, Humanists are still in denial about the truth.  Not about whether God exists, which is unprovable, but with their misdirected blame on religion and God for not only hampering man's advancements but truly being the cause of all wars and destruction.  While some ask what planet the arsenic binging bugs are from, I want to know what spaceship dropped these "Humanists" here?  Do they know what "human" means?  

God, religion, guns, drugs, Capitalism, even Satan and Communism, all the main scapegoats for man's failings, ARE NOT TO BLAME for where we are, or aren't.  If I could take a magic wand and erase all these concepts, forces and items from human existence but left man with the same brain and coded drives we all share, I dare say, we'd be at best, in the same place, more likely worse than we are today.

The truth is, Humanists don't have a problem with God, they have a problem with their fellow human.  And one can't get more human than that!  In the guise of wanting harmony through intellectual thought, the Humanists only add to the din of conflict around the world.  In their attempt to prove the backwardness of all people who "believe the myth" the Humanists claim religion impedes science.  None of us wants that!  We all know that science is the key to improving man's existence.

Apparently Humanists don't know or want to know that many Christians, even those especially backward ones called Catholics are the "Fathers" of such areas of science as Modern Chemistry, Modern Algebra, Modern Atomic Theory, and many others.  They obviously are not aware that 35 craters on the moon are named after Jesuit priests who furthered modern science with their findings and that thousands of Catholic scientists have and are advancing man's knowledge in all areas of science to this day.  FYI:  http://www.catholiclab.net/TheCatholicLaboratory/About_Us.html  .

Humanists go on to blame all wars on religion.  In my opinion, this is a false argument.  A belief system does not cause destruction from conflict, MAN who hides behind religion causes destruction from conflict.  If it isn't religion, it's Ford vs Chevy, Betty Crocker opposed to Duncan Hines, over-the-top toilet paper hangers against from-the-back-of-the-roll toilet paper hangers.  Man will seek an issue to align against another man, no matter what.

Are humans doomed to always be in conflict?  Yes, it's the way we are designed (or spontaneously hard-wired by pure chance out of thin air).  But conflict does not have to be destructive or disrespectful.  Along with our argumentative nature, we have the power to control our behavior and conduct ourselves in a civil, respectful manner.  Agree to disagree, heard of it?

However, our friends, the Humanists, do not want anyone, anywhere, celebrating the Birth of Christ publicly, never, ever...for the rest of time...that means forever.  To them, I pose the argument that the worship of secularism goes on daily throughout the year.  I am assaulted routinely by slogans, signs, public practices that fly in the face of my personal values.  That is life.  I get it.

The daily brainwashing of secularism is one I've learned to exist with.  In spite of the overwhelming volume of these beliefs and practices forced upon me, I see a way I can live amongst this while staying true to my chosen values and faith.    

One would think eleven months domination of the public square would be sufficient for the NO GOD crowd.  Apparently if one's message is sketchy, it means NO HOLIDAYS, especially during the HOLY DAYS. 

My dear Humanists, scream all you want against God if it makes you feel better.  He can certainly take it.  Like the old Hollywood adage, doesn't matter what they say about you, as long as they're saying something.

And I'm confident, regardless of naysayers, Jews will celebrate Hanukkah and Christians, like me, will merrily celebrate Christmas with family, some old friends, and in my case, some new friends, who strangely requested I add an arsenic dish to the menu (must be lactose intolerant). 


 



      

Independent? Co-Dependent?

The idea of dividing the human condition into two categories is never a smart thing to do.  There are infinite variables that influence what life philosophy each person subscribes to and in 99.99% of the cases, a person follows some combination of any number of philosophies concurrently.  Having said that, I will tap into my "Marxist side" and boldly assign all people into one of two camps; Independents and Co-Dependents.

Each of these types have two subsets within them.  The Independents are made up of Leaders and Supporters.  The Leaders are those in the Independent society who have been successful in their particular goal.  They serve as examples and inspiration to those individuals (Supporters) who are in the process of goal pursuit.  The benefits between the relationship of Leaders and Supporters go both directions.  The Supporters provide the Leaders the much needed aspect to all individuals who want to continue to grow, that being competition.  The Old Pro always relishes the challenge from the Young Up and Comer. 

Though Leaders are people who have proven their talents and succeeded in their field, the Independent society believes all people need to be pushed to their limits the span of one's lifetime.  No person in an Independent society rests on their laurels.  In fact, any one individual can serve as Leader and Supporter any number of times within their life, making each person's experience perpetually in flux while putting the entire society continually headed in a forward momentum.   Such a society promotes the freedom of all to pursue the goals of their choice with no guarantee of success or failure rather focusing on the actual pursuit as the source of an individual's true fulfillment.

For an Independent society, Capitalism as it's economic model, is a reasonably good fit when matched with a small central government, a larger local government, both answering to the people they serve.  This society promotes the concept of risk, allowing for a continuum of innovation and advancements like no other economic strategy can. 

The possibility of devastating failures exist but time and time again, some of the biggest failures in history resulted in the most magnificent successes.  Thomas Edison is a perfect example.  As a boy, he was deemed too stupid to learn anything by his teacher.  Because Edison was a true individual who refused to let anyone determine his success but himself, he conducted over 9,000 experiments before finally creating the first working lightbulb.  By the end of his life he had 1,093 U.S. patents held in his name.  This sort of success through successive failure can only take place in a society where the individual is free to pursue their God-given visions.

America use to be an Independent society.  For several decades we have been drifting from this.  And only recently the drift became full speed away from the Independent concept.  We have betrayed our founding ideals.  We have handed over the reins to a Co-Dependent model rendering us closer to serfs than citizens.  In fact, due to an ever-encroaching Federal Government, a college drop-out by the name of Bill Gates, could never start up a little software company called Microsoft in today's Big Government environment.  Think about that!

In today's America, we are now subjects of the Co-Dependent model.  Depending on what sort of person you are, this is either a dream come true or a sheet-soaking nightmare.  Where we use to have two classes in our Independent society, we still have two in our Co-Dependent but the functions are profoundly different.  In a Co-Dependent environment one is either a Keeper or a Pet.  The Keepers are a relative handful of self-appointed intellectual elites whose role is to control and maintain the existence of all the world's Pets.  Pets are people who expect their Keepers to provide food, clothing, shelter, education, healthcare, and at the very least, a pretense of a job.

Keepers are self-evaluated and are suppose to provide all Pets with equal provisions.  Of course, though they hate to admit it, Keepers are human.  They inevitably have their "favorite" Pets.  These Pets will receive higher quality provisions which, on the surface seems to be quite a nice existence.  There is a down side.  Once a Pet is favored by a Keeper, that Pet is monitored closer and held to higher standards of Keeper loyalty than the rest of the Pets kept in the normal kennel runs. 

At the end of the day though, the people who are Pets, much like the protesters in Greece and now the students in England, expect their Keepers to KEEP.  Unfortunately, though the Keepers say otherwise, they are not GOD and can not drop manna from heaven no matter how many academic degrees or Nobel Peace Prizes they have.  Sadly, the current generation of Pets have no desire to break free and take responsibility for their own existence.  The very fact they were not aborted in their minds means they are entitled to Government care from cradle to grave.  The key word being "grave".

The Keepers have a love hate relationship with their Pets.  They need the Pets in order to justify the role of Keeper in the first place but though a Keeper may feel pity for a Pet, a Pet is and always will be inferior to the Keeper.  A Keeper craves total control, often initially under the guise of "knowing what is best" for the ignorant Pets.  Economically, the Keepers have all rights to any pay the Pet's generate.  In return, the Keepers provide the Pets all the things the Keepers think the Pets need to live.  The incentive to make a good living diminishes since all Pets are given the same regardless of performance.  Besides, the less you work, the less of yours gets taken by the Keepers but the more free stuff you get.  Not good stuff but still, it's free.  Free stuff just no freedom.

Though the Keepers claim open-mindedness, a Keeper's total control over his/her Pets require the scrubbing out of any "GOD" concept in the Keeper/Pet Society.  In such a society, the threat of any religion other than the worship of the Keeper, is toxic, even lethal to the Keeper.  Though most Pets happily subscribe to a "God is Myth" philosophy when times are good, in economically troubled times, the concept of God becomes the biggest threat to Keeper domination.  That's why it is important in a Co-Dependent society to get them young, educate them in purely secular, progressive thought and remind them time and time and time again, Keepers are the Key to Getting Stuff FREE.

In contrast, the Independent society actually invites the worship of a Creator though belief in such is not at all required.  Since there is no "supreme" Leader who has the responsibility over the welfare or control of others in the society, the concept of God holds no threat to Independent Leaders.  Worship of God within an Independent society serves the individual as a means of inspiration to dig deep into one's source of talents and grow, especially after times of personal failure.  Personal belief is a personal affair.  In fact, the atheist in an Independent society has the excellent motivation of this life being the one and only shot at living out his/her personal aspirations and doing so with the fruits of  labor spent however one wishes.  It is true, the atheist mindset finds its greatest chance at success within the structure of Independent societies not the NO GOD ZONE of Co-Dependency.

Though atheism in a Co-Dependent society is touted as intellectually superior, ironically, the atheist Pet is perhaps the most limited human being within the Co-Dependent society.  An atheist Pet has no mental concept to engage when all hope and dignity are stripped from them.  It's one thing to fail in an Independent society where your failure is yours to deal with, your business to pick yourself up from but to be Godless living in a society capable of taking your identity, diminishing your self worth and assigning you your fate, that's about as low as a human can exist.   Conversely, the Pet who harbors notions of a power beyond this reality can retain some level of dignity that no Keeper can touch.  If a Pet with no God falls out of favor with their Keeper, all I can say is, God help them.

To be fair, there certainly can be good Keepers with happy Pets.  This is the model all Co-Dependent societies work from though none have lived up to.  The Co-Dependent model does have its place.  As a matter of fact, within the Independent society, mini Co-Dependent units exist with the actual blessing of the Independent society as a whole.  These mini C-D units are called "families".  On this scale the Co-Dependent set-up has its best chance at succeeding due to a brilliant safety valve built in called adult emancipation.  Obviously, parents are the Keepers in the power structure, children the Pets but in this case, there comes a day when the Keepers end their rule, setting the Pets free to fully engage in the realm of Independence, to sink or swim on their own. 

Parents, like Keepers, can be good or they can suck, regardless emancipation insures no one remains a Pet forever, especially under a bad Keeper. Unfortunately, less and less individuals are taking advantage of an Independent society's emancipation.  When a 26 year-old is guaranteed coverage under his/her PARENT'S health insurance, there's a demeaning force at work planting the seeds for arrested development far into one's lifetime.  TWENTY-SIX?  I had my first gray hairs by 26!  For Pete's sake, have some pride!

While the family unit can be a successful example of Co-Dependent success in an Independent society, much like God, the family unit in a full-blown Co-Dependent society is a real threat.  Again, it provides a Pet with the possibility of aligning with a pack based on blood ties.  In a Co-Dependent society, blood ties are frowned upon, with packs formed under the guidance of the Keeper alone.  Careful temperament screenings are made to make sure any pack formed will not have the dynamics to turn on the Keeper.  Got it?  All breeding and social interaction are directed and monitored by the Keeper, period.

The brilliance of the Co-Dependent society comes in the causes initially promoted.  It champions the perceived "victims" of an Independent society, highlighting how unfair Independence is to the weak.  If a person is a racial minority, a female, uneducated, personally defined by their sexual orientation, lazy, pre-disposed to a life of crime, a low-paid worker, or actor, the Co-Dependent Keepers will promise the moon.  Like the case of the atheist,  these "victims" are the first round recruits to Pethood in a Co-Dependent society. However, the fact is, their odds of achieving their highest capabilities greatly diminish when kept as Pets.  Even criminals fair better in an Independent society where the number of wealthy people with stuff worth stealing always far exceeds the measly handful of wealthy Keepers in a Co-Dependent society.  And Lord knows the stuff your fellow Pets have isn't worth the trouble.

So why not let the Independent minded people try their society unimpeded in one sliver of the planet and give the rest of the globe over to the Keepers and Pets?  Well, this sorta happened, once for a short period of time.  It was called the United States of America and it lasted about 100 years.  Then word got out to way too many Pets.  Pets began leaving their Keepers in droves.  Something had to be done!  And so characters like Marx and his intellectual elite set began the new campaign.  The Independent experiment had to end before it became too powerful and screwed up the gig for all the Keepers. 

If the Keepers were so smart, why not start their own Independent society and flourish there?  Why not come to America and see how and why it is good to give man the right to form his own destiny?  Some Keepers did and because many are actually smart, they succeeded and flourished.   But ultimately, the only way these sorts of individuals are fulfilled is when they control not just their own destiny, but the destiny of other men.  If Independence caught on globally, GOOD BYE KEEPERS. 

As technology advanced and communication became possible from one end of the earth to the other at the push of a button, the message HAD to be accelerated to take down the Independent movement.  Co-Dependent Keepers rely on class warfare to demonize Independents instead of being intellectually honest and comparing the poor of an Independent society to the conditions of people living as the poorest Pets in Co-Dependent societies.  There is no question which society does a better job.  The Independent, pro-human, self-destiny-driven experiment that promotes authentic free-thought trumps the false sympathies and empty promises of the Co-Dependent society every time.

Cut to the Keeper in the corner with his hand over his ears singing "lah-lah-lah-lah-lah, I can't hear you, lah-lah-lah-LAH!

Regardless of the times, there will always be the man who believes the abilities of the individual are to be unfettered for his and society's benefit.  There will always be the man who believes fettered masses benefit more when saved from themselves.  If history holds any answers, we're due some serious fettering soon.  America's government officials pit man against man as they shamelessly proclaim that not raising taxes on the rich is taking money from the Government.  Who earned the money, Ms. Pelosi?  Who employs workers, Ms. Pelosi?  Not you, Madame!  But clearly, in one way or another, you are certainly a KEEPER.  When this is the mindset spoken on public airwaves as fact, you know Big Government and dark days are ahead for the spirit of Independence.

Some say trying to fight forces like the ones currently on the hunt for the last remnants of the Independent ideal is folly.  It's like trying to stop winter from following autumn.  Then again, some individuals do head for Florida this time of year!  Where there's a will...you'll find an Independent.  

God bless the Independents and all those Pets thinking about losing their muzzle and collar for good.
  

     

The World's Powerful Children Play Dangerous Games

To read the headlines today one has to ask where did the adults go?  I feel like I'm in that episode of Star Trek entitled Miri where Captain Kirk lands on a planet that is plagued by a virus which kills off all adults, leaving only children to run the society. 

Kirk learns the virus was a failed attempt at prolonging life, allowing humans to age one month with every 365 days.  However, once puberty is finally reached, the virus strikes, causing horrible blue sores to form prior to death. 

Though many of the "children" Kirk finds are over 300 years old, their emotional and mental maturity is that of their physical maturity.  The younger children are docile and compliant, believing everything the older children tell them, including that all adults "grups" are bad.   

Each child, as they reach puberty, become violent, enraged and totally irrational meeting with a swift but agonizing demise.  From what I see, many of the world's leaders have reached that pre-pubescent stage and boy, we're talking more than mood swings going on! 

Currently the world's upper graders are telling the world's lower school what to think.  They tell us they are smart but it becomes clearer and clearer that our leading tweens are in over their heads. 

The Wikileaks debacle underscores this though really didn't reveal any surprises.  Like all jealous adolescents with bad skin, Julian Assange thinks taking pot shots at the popular crowd will finally make him cool. 

In reality,  Assange's big news didn't match the hype, painting other student council presidents in less competent light than our own trainer-bra-wearing leaders but no doubt, this will make it much more difficult for America to be voted Homecoming Queen anytime soon.

Though the Wikileaks news has more entertainment value hence more headlines, the real outbreak of the Miri virus is most evident in the recent release of "Risky Business II" ie; IRELAND GONE WILD.  Like a bunch of spoiled brats who were being told their Kardashian credit cards would be cut up in 2009 if they voted NO on the Lisbon Treaty, the entitlement teens of Erin sold their identity.

This act sealed their economic, political, and personal enslavement to the European Union. The Treaty was meant to insure.  The truth is, FOR SURE, the Treaty is no CURE it's just more of the disease.

If only Captain Kirk had paid a visit to Ireland before they voted and explained to them the truth.  Ah, but apparently he did, in the form of Nigel Farage... (WARNING, a bit lengthy but this discourse a year ago reveals who is peddling the lie and who sees through it.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC4Mn9Grs3w&NR=1&feature=fvwp

But Mr. Farage's mistake was being British and in Irish that's the equivalent to being a "grup".  No matter what, "grups" can not be trusted.  And so Ireland went the way of a texting teen in a speeding car, oblivious to what is really at stake, their life, other's lives, just focused on pushing SEND.

The blue spots are starting to form on pubescent political leaders the world over.  Ironically, the very upper graders who are pushing the lethal policies will be the first to fall victim to the virus.  Like all adolescents, they honestly believe they are invincible.  And where does that leave the younger ones?  Are we at the older kids' mercy or will Captain Kirk give us the cure?  It seems he's trying to but will we listen?  (Not to worry, this clip is SHORTER but important)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CEu2sy2Z_0

A little side note, in the Star Trek episode, the cure for the "youth virus" was successful but not without experiencing a bit of pain in the process.

I am not a One World advocate but I do suggest the people of the world take a collective TIME OUT.  We need to unplug our iPods, put down the cell phones, log off Facebook for a minute and THINK for ourselves.  Not all "grups" are bad.  Just the "grups" who don't ACT like "grups".  Learn the difference and then grow up.

Thank God for BARACK OBAMA!

On this day before Thanksgiving I find myself taking moments among the frenzied preparations for tomorrow's celebration to stop and reflect on the things that I am so very thankful for.  All the predictable aspects of my life head the list; my family, my faith, good health, etc. 

Beyond my personal reflections, I take a look at the big picture I find myself within. Though these times are shaky and in many cases, difficult and scary, I am thankful for the amazing men who conceived, believed and dared to write our Constitution.  I marvel at their foresight or perhaps their clarity regarding the obvious weaknesses and limitless strengths of human nature. 

The brilliance of our Constitution, with all the safeguards to liberty it insures, is one of, if not the greatest documents of confidence in the talents and goodness of man, the individual not the serf.  This document, since its drafting, has been the bane of all tyrants and men of questionable character.  There have always been forces at work attempting to shred this ideal.  But like no other time before, these enemies of liberty are more visible and bolder than ever ...and not a moment too soon!

Had these forces not kicked into high gear, had they only stood on the sidelines, patiently waiting for the weaknesses of human nature to set in so deep and so thoroughly that the ideal of man's freedom would simply sigh, die, and disappear without a whimper, our fate would have been sealed.  Had that these forces remained stealth, we might all be a little more comfortable this year... and a lot more dead.

Thankfully, these forces came to our rescue.  Yes, our rescue.  They began to assault us to such a degree, they finally, thankfully, shook us from the deep coma of complacency we had all succumbed to.  Without these extreme threats to our founding ideals there would be no Tea Party, no realization, no chance for freedom to survive.

That is why I am truly thankful this Thanksgiving for God's great gift of Barack Obama.  In this one man, all of the aspects of human weakness is personified.  He is our chosen leader and he is US.  When we as Americans look in the mirror, what we see now is Barack Obama.  We see people dependent on bureaucracy to feed us, clothe us, house us, and tell us when to reproduce and die. We see people who whore themselves to the world just to garner a nod of acceptance.  Respect is too good for us now, we are a people prepared to submit to our masters.

We look in the mirror and see a society no longer wanting to be a destination for souls seeking freedom.  Freedom requires personal responsibility, a mantle too mighty for any human, or so says our reflection speaking to us.  He reminds us only government can save the economy (or ruin it), only government can regulate big business (or hijack it), only government can bail out our auto industry (or unionize it into failure), only the government can provide health care (or ration it), only government can negotiate with our allies and enemies (or take it up the ass by so many that no one even wants a piece anymore).

We look in the mirror and see Barack Obama.  Do we Americans recognize ourselves?  Do we like what we see?  Can we get out of bed, wash our face, roll up our sleeves and still get the job done or do we look in the mirror and decide "the hell with it" and go back to bed?  Do we now say, "let the government do it"?

Americans have two choices we all are waking up to today, tomorrow and for all mortal time to come...do we prescribe to the saying, "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" or are we still the stock who vowed to "live free or die"? 

This is why I truly am thankful to God for Barack Obama.  Without Obama and his reflection of ourselves, we as a nation never would have come out of the daze of overindulgence to recognize who we've become and ask ourselves if we are a people who even "hope" to "change" anymore. 

I know circumstances must become much worse here and around the world before improvements can occur.  But "make no mistake", only because of Barack Obama, there exists a slim chance that the best of man's spirits will rally in time for triumph.  Man always rises to his highest when faced with adversity.  With that said, the coming years hold opportunity for heights never imagined in dreams... or nightmares.

I firmly believe America always gets the leader she deserves.  Barack Obama is the leader chosen by our collective subconscious to tell us the truth about what we have become.  It is painful to accept we are now a country physically, mentally, socially, morally, spiritually weak.  It is painful to accept the fact WE led ourselves here, not Barack Obama.  That is why all Americans must thank God tomorrow and always for Barack Obama.  He will not lead us out of trouble but he is the reason America has the choice again to live free or die.

The Lord works in mysterious ways.  Thank God for Barack Obama!

        

Obama's Justice is Just Diss

The civilian trial of Ghailani, the man responsible for the 1998 embassy bombings has concluded, resulting in one guilty count of conspiracy yet NOT guilty of the 224 (12 American citizens) deaths in which his actions brought about.  The Obama Administration touts the trial as a success, claiming proof civilian trials are superior to the military tribunals.  (Don't mind the enormous cost to the American taxpayer civilian trials require compared to the $1.99 a military tribunal would run.)

Obama believes the civilian trial is the venue where the world will see how "JUST" we are yet, in the same breath he'll guarantee these terrorists, especially KSM, will either rot in jail or be executed.  I don't know about you, but to me, that's the definition of a kangaroo court.  For Obama, as long as the "fare" for something costs more, then that makes it "fair". 

Let's see the FAIR a bigger FARE got us on this one...Ghailani's sentence is a minimum of 20 years with a possibility of life ( as well as the POSSIBILITY of freedom in 20 years).  This is the definition of JUSTICE for the Obama White House.  A human, who took 224 innocent lives will be housed, fed and clothed for at least 20 years by the American taxpayer.  Now that's FARE.

What is really obnoxious is the new argument the left is now peddling, claiming Gitmo is a "paradise" for the terrorists held there.  The sooner we try them in civilian court and put them in Federal Prison, the more miserable they will rightly be. Hang on, I thought the issue with Gitmo was it was inhumane in the left's opinion? How can a thinking citizen buy into this tripe?  Or keep up with?  Ah-hah!  I get it.

Knowing the track record of our progressive left which I have kept up with, this monster, Ghailani, will be served meals according to his religious needs, given special treatment to insure his religious practices and access to play the Wii at least an hour a day.  All the while the relatives of the dead must live the next 20 years wondering if this demon will walk free again.  That's not justice, THAT is TORTURE.  Waterboard my ass! 

In Obama's world, enemies are to be respected and given as much opportunity to use our system against us as possible to show how FAIR we are.  In contrast, the relatives of Ghailani's victims are people easy to ignore.  They aren't the sort who will blow others into bits.  Brushing them aside is the right thing to do. 

In Obama's world, good people have too much happiness as it is.  If a couple hundred or thousand (9/11) are wiped out and another couple hundred (thousand) mourn their loss, that's the cost of having a happy existence with loved ones you actually care about.  Obviously, anyone who is a terrorist has lived an unhappy, unloved life.  The fact they destroy the lives of good people means they deserve our utmost respect and support in order to even the score for them and for us. 

This attitude is why Obama sees no problem ignoring the 4th Amendment to our Constitution.  Innocent, good people SHOULD be subjected to having nude images made of them that coat them with dangerous radiation or even better, allowing government thugs to poke, prod, fondle and herd American citizens like cattle to the slaughterhouse. 

The government under Obama can do things to you no policeman, or even doctor can, all in the name of "safety".  Forget the fact that neither the radiation spewing scanners or the roaming hands of the TSA agents can detect explosives hidden in body cavities.  And please don't bring up the reality that the underwear bomber (who is the excuse for all invasive measures now in place) boarded a plane OUTSIDE the country where none of this stupid, sham security measures take place.  

Obama does not value justice only justification of his control over his beloved dumb as dirt fellow citizens.  This American President fancies himself the biggest smarty pants ever.  He understands "good" is easily duped into slavery because "good" will trust long enough to be shackled whereas "evil" is slippery and must be respected, charmed and even aligned with to gain its cooperation. 

Obama will indict America to the U.N., offer full judicial rights to foreign terrorists, devalue America's currency, spend us into debt, tax us numb, physically degrade the populace to the point of self-imprisonment, undermine our military, open the doors for our enemies and has the gall to say this is all for our benefit. 

The only justice for Obama is social justice which will occur when all in his dominion are equal in housing, food, clothing, work...except for the Obamas and probably the Soros too (since Obama sorta owes Sorry-boy, big).  Besides, somebody has to be the Keepers of the ignorant masses.  Keepers always live large by social justice rules.

As Obama sees it, those who used their God-given talents to better their lives will have to give most of their earnings to those who are not able or willing to work for these things.  This is Obama's chosen goal.  In his value set, any act which brings about such a reality is justifiably just.  Hmmm, sort of like the justification of terrorist acts for the "peace" prescribed in the Q'uran.  Nah, that's just crazy talk!

In this new America of Obama, our Lady Justice is not only blind but she's gagged, bound and has the hand of a TSA agent up her skirt.  Obama has dissed what is just for that which is social justice.  Social Justice?  More like social disease if you ask me.

   

Fey Feigns, PBS Strains, Who Gains At Mark Twain's?

Bless her heart, that little Tina Fey.  She tried to simply be funny during the PBS broadcast of the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor but apparently her shtick didn't click for the PBS execs.  They claim they cut her speech due to time constraints but anyone with a brain knows they cut Fey's slam on Palin and conservative women in general simply because they are still licking wounds brought on by the Juan Williams fiasco. 

The last thing PBS needs is more evidence they are a media shill for the far left.  And so the left chooses to stifle free speech rather than play by their own ideals.  Tina, did you learn nothing from the human sacrifice of Juan Williams?  The left has no loyalty, no standards, no shame.  Right on cue, movements that tout government enforced social equality for all, predictably resort to cannibalism when their message begins to spell out their actual goals.

Here's what Fey said that PBS didn't "have time" for you to hear:

"And, you know, politics aside, the success of Sarah Palin and women like her is good for all women - except, of course --those who will end up, you know, like, paying for their own rape 'kit 'n' stuff," Fey said. "But for everybody else, it's a win-win. Unless you're a gay woman who wants to marry your partner of 20 years - whatever. But for most women, the success of conservative women is good for all of us. Unless you believe in evolution. You know - actually, I take it back. The whole thing's a disaster."

First off, this lie that the left floated about Palin supporting the payment for rape kits by the victim is rarely corrected.  The truth behind the rape kit story goes back to the Former Police Chief, Charlie Fannon, who served when Palin was Mayor of Wasilla.  Fannon was quoted by two reporters saying he did not think the cost of such kits should be the burden of Wasilla tax payers.  He went on to say he believed the cost should be covered by the criminal.  This part of his opinion on the matter was conveniently left out as is the fact that Sarah Palin, as Mayor, never supported this measure.  I don't fault Fey for continuing this lie, she's but a mindless bot in the army of mindless bots.  Her program does not contain a fact finding ap.  Bless her bot.

This is how the left operates, taking a shred of information and weaving an amazing, colorful, fantastical yarn with it.  Most times the truth is just the opposite of what they claim but facts never stop the minions of the left from obeying the instructions of their masters.

There's no explanation needed for Fey's objection to conservative women's views on gay marriage.  That is a valid aspect to lampoon and depending on a person's opinion, the line either is funny or not.  Fey is good on that score. 

As for the evolution bit, more false insinuation being spewed by the Feybot.  I don't know one conservative, male or female who wants the theories of evolution banned.  On the contrary, conservatives want the THEORIES of evolution as well as the THEORIES of  creationism taught so that children in our public schools have the opportunity to be exposed to all possibilities. 

Teaching only one line of thought is in direct opposition to the definition of a liberal education yet for some reason, the concept of a Creator who possibly designed evolution in the first place, is an idea too scary for the secular left to wrap their heads around as adults let alone exposing the minds of their vulnerable progeny to. 

Questionable theories are spouted constantly.  This will be true till the end of time (if you believe in such a thing).  Our children need to hear truth as well as tripe and be capable themselves in deciding what is what.  Call me crazy, but I thought that was the point of a liberal education, the free exchange of ideas no matter how boring or off the wall.  Why is the left so terrified of hearing opposing viewpoints?  Is it because their arguments suck?

My progeny are exposed to liberal ideals all day, every day.  The difference is I have made a game out of pointing out the liberal propaganda and explaining my reasons why it fails profoundly in helping people.  I lay out my opinions as to how progressive movements serve to enslave the human spirit, not enrich it.  This game has been so successful that my kids are now the ones pointing out liberal themes and explaining the progressive fallacies to me! 

This is why I think PBS should have aired Fey's comments in full.  Either live by your standards or stop claiming you have them.  She won an award that she certainly deserves more than the ones doled out to Obama, Gore, Carter and Yasser Arafat.  Tina Fey has actually made me laugh on occasion.  Those other lefties with awards on their shelves have only made me cry yet the left silences little Tina Fey.  PBS ironically has become the network of Professional Bot Silencers.  So courageous they are.

PBS chopped Juan Williams for going off the left's script partially even though he was actually making a point FOR the left's script.  Now they scrap Fey for speaking directly, verbatim, not one word edited from the progressive left's script. 

Why would they muzzle their minions from both sides of their group?  Is it because the message is finally being clearly deciphered?  Yes, and the control center knows it.  All the high-minded, altruistic code words (social justice, green, hope, change, evolution) are finally being understood for what they actually mean, the loss of an individual's privacy, personal property, personal beliefs, personal liberty, person hood, period.

This is the moment of truth.  The progressive left has never been this close to real world-wide control as they are at this moment in history yet never have they been this close to being completely revealed for who they actually are and what they truly stand for.  Technology is their favorite tool but it may well be their ultimate downfall.  Are you a name or a number?  There will be a moment we will all have to decide which we go by.

Me? "My name is Raymond J. Johnson, Jr. Now you can call me Ray, or you can call me J, or you can call me Johnny, or you can call me Sonny, or you can call me Junie, or you can call me Ray J, or you can call me RJ, or you can call me RJJ, or you can call me RJJ Jr." or you can even call me STUPID...


But don't ever call me 0238590572.
Besides, that number is reserved for little Tina Feybot, anyway.


    

How To Handle the TSA... WARNING: This Stinks

Did you know that TSA officially means Touchers of Sensitive Areas?  A man going through airport security recently recorded on his video cellphone the latest in the land of hope and change.  Smartly this fellow refuses the radiation soaked body scan but agrees to a pat down with the warning for the agent regarding "his junk".  From that, the guy not only is detained, not allowed to fly but is fined $10,000.

So our government protects the right of screaming nutcases to humiliate and scorn the families of fallen soldiers at military funerals but a guy going through airport security is not allowed to warn a stranger about touching his "junk". 

Under Bush, I had some real questions about the overstepping of bounds present in the Patriot Act but nothing came close to the frontal assault the Obama Administration is waging against citizens of the United States under the guise of Homeland Security. 

Who exactly is our enemy?  A better question might be, who is Obama waging war on?  He is being chewed up and spit out by governments around the globe and all he can say is "thank you sir, may I have another?"  Yet our spineless Leader treats his own people with the respect and dignity of a red-headed step child. 

The questionably safe and obviously invasive measures being meted out at our airports and even some train terminals is less about keeping us protected and more about keeping us in line.  Apparently Obama is fine with having children's genitals felt up by some $8 an hour cretin but heaven forbid we take measures to weed out the REAL perpetrators.

We all know that the threats are coming from people who are Islamist terrorists.  We've been told we can't just check all people who look middle eastern because not all terrorists are middle eastern, besides, that's profiling and that would be...smart.  Fine, but all terrorists targeting the West are followers of Islam. 

Here's where I get crazy.  Instead of using radiation spewing machines, the twisting of breasts and grabbing of groins, lets simply have a pig skin at each checkpoint.  No matter what you look like, if you are an Islamist terrorist, you WILL NOT touch a pig skin, so help you Allah.

I know, but good muslims will not touch the pigskin either.  That's bigoted  No, it's the most efficient way to narrow down who is a REAL threat.  Though most muslims aren't terrorists, all terrorists are muslim.  This wouldn't be happening if Islam wasn't a religion of peace, a peace that can only be fulfilled when all infidels have been converted or exterminated.

Besides, which is worse?  Having an elderly woman felt up, a toddler's genitals searched, a 30 year-old white male's "junk" handled by another male unwillingly or a muslim asked to touch a pigskin?  Of course, Obama is much more worried about what muslims around the world think of him than what his own citizenry thinks of him.  We, he can bully but Saudi Kings get a big old bow.

The worst aspect to all of this...people are saying they simply will stop travelling.  I am afraid, this is the real goal.  Like the old Soviet Union, the government prohibited free movement of its citizens.  Obama can't be so bold yet but he can scare us into self-imposed imprisonment.  It's much easier to control a populace that doesn't go anywhere.  If travel declines, the airlines go under and yes, the government can take total control of those too.  Now we're talking!

Is Obama that calculating and Marxist?  I hope not.  He is however, much more eager to please those who want to weaken our country than effectively protect the American people who want to strengthen our country.  So, should people travel and be subjected to unhealthy levels of radiation or sexually invasive pat downs by government goons or should Americans stay at home, hurt the airline industry and further weaken the economy?

I think the answer is to go French.  You heard me.  If you know you're going to have to travel, stop bathing for several days prior.  Achieve your ripest stench you yourself can endure and then go for it!  Opt for that personal pat down. 

My neighbor (a frequent business traveler) has reported great success with yet another form of offensive bodily odor which he has personally employed during recent security checks.  Regardless of the method, if the TSA agent is going to feel you up, do your level best to make sure you disgust them with every poke and prod.

Then, when the rest of the world tells us we stink, at least they'll finally be right!

Why Earmarks Equal MORE Than The SUM of Their Parts

And the tone deaf, head up their arse, don't touch my goodies mentality in Washington continues...

Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader, Republican, (conservative?) tries to "school" us big dummies as to why a ban on earmarks is nothing but folly.  This so-called conservative politician points to the fact that earmarks add up to less than a pittance in the scheme of Federal debt.  That is his rationale.  He's a Senator and don't you dare question him! 

What a pompous tool McConnell is.  What year is he living in?  Mitchie, it ain't 2009 anymore.  Does he really think we don't get it?  True, the hard numbers of the cost of all earmarks together is minuscule when compared to the mountains of debt our country has incurred but what Pinch Face doesn't own up to is the fact that all these palm greasings, I mean earmarks, are the usher to big EXPENSIVE unaffordable legislation being passed.  Example: had an Earmark Ban been in effect there would be NO OBAMACARE.  Oh, but to dream.

Earmarks (the Louisiana Purchase and Cornhusker Kickback) are the only reason that 2000 page unread monstrosity got through the Senate.  True, those two BRIBES were a drop in the bucket however, the cost brought on by those cheap tips are what really takes costs to the American people to a new level.   For instance, now a majority of states are spending funds to pay the legal fees to prove Obamacare Unconstitutional.  That may well be a state's cost but the Federal Government has to spend oodles to defend the bad legislation too.  Of course, the American Taxpayer is on the hook both for bringing the suit and defending it.  No Dorothy, we're not in Kansas anymore! 

And to add insult to injury, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that OBAMACARE sucks, the administration just waived an additional 111 organizations (mostly unions) from being subject to the rules and regulations of OBAMACARE.  Translation, small companies with no D.C. lobbyists on your payroll, you're screwed.  This act in itself is admission that this "tome of trouble" is nothing more than a job killer (adding exponentially to our debt) yet for a measly couple bucks our representatives in Washington were bought off to vote for it.  In essence, this one example of the REAL cost of earmarks is what must be considered and why earmarks must be banned.

Here's a concept: If a piece of legislation requires a bribe to be voted for, perhaps it's not a law we should be passing in the first place?  Silly thought, I know.   

Are all earmarks bad?  No, some are valid and even worthy but the use of them has spun out of control.   Earmarks are to Congress, what a sip of beer is to an alcoholic. The substance itself is not lethal but the misuse and abuse of it can grow into an addiction that eventually destroys all it touches.  Washington has a serious addiction problem that they are unwilling to own up to.  No matter what side of the aisle one stands, the cold sweats begin en mass when talk of banning their precious earmarks is uttered.

On paper, earmarks are indeed a small amount of the spending problem but I submit that they are the essential catalyst to the explosion of Congressional spending.  Take that catalyst out of Congress's lab and see what happens.  Worse case scenario, without the earmarks, Congress may end up passing nothing and with Congress's recent track record, that may be a very good thing.

UPDATE:  McCONNELL GOT RELIGION!  Will he hold fast or fall from the wagon?  Keep your eyes on this one. 

Sarah Palin: A Winning Coach, Not League Commissioner

Sarah Palin is the reason I cast a vote in the 2008 election.  I am no fan of John McCain for many of the reasons most conservatives are not.  But when he chose Sarah Palin and she hit the stage delivering that mind blowing speech at the RNC Convention, my belief in the Republican party was resuscitated. 

Several weeks later I had the memorable experience of seeing Sarah Palin in person.  She came to speak in my town and I was not going to miss it.  I was less than 20 feet from the stage which meant I got there EARLY.  It was an incredibly long, hot day on a wide open dustbin of a field.  I was with my mom, my two eldest daughters and about 50 thousand of my closest conservative friends.  Granted, we stood thirsty and hungry for 6+ hours to hear a 20 minute speech but to this day, I still get inspired when I think about how energizing Sarah Palin was.  There is no doubt about the fact that Sarah Palin is electric.  Electricity can make things run and it can also cause destruction.

Our country is in tatters in many ways, but especially ideologically.  There are tiffs, rifts and mile wide chasms within the Democratic party.  The Leftist fringe is attempting to hold moderate and conservative Democrats hostage just long enough to re-elect Obama in 2012.  (Word to Manchin: jump ship now because all hostages will be executed December, 2012 if Obama takes a 2nd term). 

Following the recent election victories, the Republican party is riding the happy bus for the next two more minutes or so but already the ultimatums, backstabbing and name calling can be heard from the back of this bus tour. There are the predictable power struggles amongst Tea Party groups not to mention the obvious odds between the Republican establishment and conservative groups in general. 

Don't get me wrong, all this bickering is ultimately good for a flushing of ideas and message.  Now is the time solutions and tactics are being formed, adopted or pitched to the side.   At the end of the day our country can only succeed on the battleground of ideas.  Ultimately, the idea we choose must be one that most Americans can relate to and rally behind together while retaining distinct ideologies and beliefs.  This is the hallmark of the U.S.A. and what makes us the authentic, successful example of freedom.

Having said this, allow me to resort to a thoroughly American analogy, football.  For the game to exist, there must be opposing teams, each with a coach that understands the talents within that particular team and can stir up the passion, drive and ultimate execution needed for that team to be victorious.  Coach Mike Ditka and his Chicago Bears stirs the image of one sort of football team; a collection of raw talent, serious heft, grit and some limited finesse led by a loud and proud personification all these traits.  On the other end of the field is another sort of outfit, the Miami Dolphins headed by Don Shula, master strategist and tactical chameleon.  Both men have a personality taylor-made to focus their teams on the mission and bring home victory.  These men thrive on competition and shine brightest when opposition is greatest.

This is the description of Sarah Palin.  She is, in essence, a winning football coach.  She knows the strengths of her team's message. She will provide the tough love to those on the team who stray from the purpose.  She keeps the players stoked and the hometown crowd not only cheering but buying season tickets, a hot dog and a cold one to boot.  This is what the Republican Party needs.  This is the role Sarah Palin can and, in my opinion, the role she should play...a winning coach...not a league commissioner.

In the last Presidential election the American people made the grave mistake of hiring a first round draft pick as Commissioner of the League.  Obama barely played the game let alone being equipped to oversee the welfare of all players, coaches and fans!  Obama's allegiance is to his slime-ball agent, one Gyorgy Soros Schwartz and Soros alone.  Though I believe Coach Palin would make good decisions for the league (country), I know the fans of the opposition conference would never ever, ever hear her out long enough to consider her ideas. 

The President of the United States, like the Commissioner of the League, must make decisions for the good of all the teams of both conferences.  He or she must be able to articulate the rationale of policies so that most of the players, coaches and fans can at least relate to the cause if not whole heartily support it.  I believe the next President of the United States should be a committed conservative but this person must possess a demeanor of calm determination and confident clarity.  The conservative pick for president must be able to make the argument without the trademark red meat rhetoric that was so greatly needed in anemic conservative circles of the LAST two election cycles. 

Though the conservative team is now fortified with protein, there is no doubt we will always need a hard-nosed coach to direct and set up the touchdown.  Sarah Palin would be the "winning est" coach in the CFC ( Conservative Political Conference), no doubt.  But putting her up to be commissioner of the entire league?  No.  Not a winning strategy.

I have high hopes for a couple of her star players, Marco Rubio and Kristi Noem.  These are two individuals possessing the right temperament for our conflict-weary country.  Both believe, live and deliver the message without the vitriol.  2012 may be too soon for either of them to be considered but their personalities exemplify the calm clarity and reserved confidence a UNITED States of America could quiet down for, listen to, look at and finally recognize our shared goal of a successful, flourishing, land of freedom. 

Politics is a game of personality and timing.  After 8 years of Bush, the country was willing to believe in a fairytale and unfortunately, we did.  We've woken up and are ready for reality.  Palin may have good, common sense ideas but her delivery will always sound like a locker room speech to "Team Right Wing".  Conservatives have to put forth a candidate that doesn't compromise ideals while still being able to put the electorate at ease long enough to allow them to absorb the concepts and if not make these ideals their own at least see the logic behind them. 

A single team can win a single game by brute force however, the success of the league comes from all teams agreeing to the goals of the league together.  The conservative candidate for League Commissioner is yet to be found but it is clear our Head Coach position has been successfully filled.  I just hope Coach Palin has signed the long term contract and not the two year one.

Michelle's Taxing Social Agenda with Veterans

When Time Magazine announced, "We Are All Socialists Now" Michelle Obama decided to stretch her social muscles like no other First Lady before.  In true Socialist fashion, Michelle our Belle, at taxpayer's expense, hired a staggering 22 staffers to aid her exclusively in managing her "social agenda".  Four of these valuable human beings are paid over $100,000 each with the other 18 working for a bit more than peanuts.

Judging from history, Michelle Obama's predecessors were real slackers.  Laura Bush only had one social assistant who was paid for out of the Bush family's own pocket.  How gauche!  Hillary only needed 3 assistants, 2 of which exclusively tended to the color coding of her pants suits which is pretty remarkable considering the number of shades of blue she has alone.  Nancy Reagan had one assistant as did Jackie Kennedy, the epitome of style and grace, the gold standard of American First Ladies.  If Michelle Obama is striving to be the anti-Jackie, she's succeeding on that score. 

I realize Michelle's excesses have been highlighted many times before, to no avail.  If anything, criticism of Mrs. Obama results in even more arrogant extravagance and waste on her part.  So why spend my time kavetching about the insipid tax payer-funded spending of our self-important First Lady?  She's not going to change, I know, I know. 

However, on this Veteran's Day, when I heard about 73-year-old Army veteran, Joe Andreuzzi, receiving a FOUR CENT check issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, I could not stop thinking of our patronizing First Lady and her self-serving photo-ops with our Veterans.  I could hear her citing all the benefits she's brought them through the Recovery Act that funded 1,500 temporary jobs for claims processors to speed benefits to veterans like the big FOUR CENTS Joe Andreuzzi received.  Gee, thanks Mrs. Obama.  You really shouldn't have!  I mean that.

I loved hearing Joe's response to the ridiculous check.  Even though he'll be forty cents in the hole, Joe's mailing the FOUR CENTS back to Obama to help pay down the debt.  So much for the efficiency of the Recovery Act!  With all the success Mrs. Obama's efforts have brought, one would expect the First Lady, whose focus on Military Families and Veterans Affairs she personally selected to champion, would be here, in the U.S., honoring our servicemen and women this Veteran's Day.  Instead she's adding to the cost of our elected leader's Asia trip, racking up the tab with her essential 22 member staff in tow.  To be fair, I do have to point out the fact that Mrs. Obama along with Dr. Jill Biden did go out of their way for our military and offer the following heartfelt sentiments via video tape:

 http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2010/11/10/a-veterans-day-message-first-lady-michelle-obama-and-dr-jill-biden

Wow, that's powerful stuff.  Per the Obama's "style" they have no problem asking us for our attention, our service, our money, our votes but when it comes to them listening to us, don't hold your breath.  So as I exhale the negativity with my preceding diatribe, I'll inhale with the positive spirit of Joe Andreuzzi and all our other honorable veterans who should be the real focus of all of us this day and everyday as we thank them for their service to our nation.  They may not be paid the salaries of the First Lady's Social (ist) Assistants, but we the people can do right by them in ways Michelle Obama will never understand.
  

Soros' One World Order...A 2nd Rate Petting Zoo

As a kid I remember watching Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom and getting upset when Marlon Perkins would step aside, allowing nature to take its course.  It seemed wrong to let those baby tigers fend for themselves or the gazelle get taken down by the lion.  Marlon was standing right there!  He could have stopped all the suffering and carnage but instead, he simply filmed for us so we could see the sometimes happy, sometimes sad, sometimes frightening reality of life in the wild. 

Why would such a sweet, kind, knowledgeable man, which Marlon seemed to be, not step in and make all the episodes happy, save all the animals in danger?  My father explained to me that if man gets involved in the process of these animals' survival, he would create far more suffering and destruction than what occurs naturally.  Animals fair best when left alone to find their own food, solve their own dilemmas, stake out their own territory.  Wild animals are happiest minus man's intervention.  I would soon learn this holds true for all of God's creatures.

How many times have we all heard "do not feed the bears"?  Why not?  Because if the bears become dependent on food from humans they lose their hunting instincts, their diets become poor and they actually develop a taste for processed food over the more nutritious wild game.  If a bear does become addicted and dependent, they are more likely to seek out humans, causing danger to people and the bear alike. 

This scenario of dependence holds true for human beings as well.  Think of the riots today in England as well as the ones that happened in Greece and France where people are dependent on the government for their livelihood from cradle to grave.  When 20 somethings are protesting about working till the age of 62, that's a pathetic example of humans with zero self-reliance.  What has become of young people when they beg for authority to provide them their dreams?  Someone has been feeding the bears for far too long.  Now that the tourists have exceeded their limits on their credit cards and have to pack up and go home, the junk food is gobbled and gone, leaving the cubs, hungry, clawing and clueless.

Europe has been plagued with this "all-providing government" mentality for centuries compared to America who has only sipped from the cesspool of dependency at certain points in our short history.  However, as Europe toys with the idea of checking into rehab, America is full steam ahead, morphing into the big government dependency nightmare our forefathers drafted the Constitution to specifically avoid.

Enter George Soros, aka, Gyorgy Schwartz.  This man has a track record of taking down financial systems for the purpose of personally profiting as well as positioning himself to gain control of the markets he prompted to fail.  He's made no secret about his desire to bring on a One World government that he would control and provide the conscience for.  In some warped way, he rationalizes his vision as fair and just, providing all humans on the earth an equal existence.  He's plowed more money than we'll ever know into political campaigns, media outlets, academia and social outreach throughout the world to bring his dream to fruition.

The last piece in his puzzle is the destruction of the United States of America.  He finally managed to get a circus bear into the White House.  He's cracked the whip at the Fed, who obediently flooded the markets with dollars.  And his media pool of trained seals are regurgitating the script he provides on a daily basis.  Does Mr. Schwartz (that translates to "Mr. Black" in English) really want the people of the world to be happy?  No.  His reality of equality for all the humans of the world is no better than the existence of pitiful animals found in a petting zoo. 

Since the beginning of time societies have formed with the authority of the masses in the hands of an unelected few.  Some rulers in this scenario are intelligent, honest men bringing prosperity to that particular society...for a while.  But inevitably in human existence, power is handed off to a jerk or worse, an egotistical madman.  Sure, the dependent masses are treated equally under such a ruler, equally poor.  It's the same old story, one step forward under a good ruler, two steps back under a putz.  The only constant is the fact that the masses are kept like caged animals, with little to no ability to determine their own destiny.

Fast forward to the creation of the United States of America.  With its conception, the gates of the petting zoo were flung open.  All of the animals determined to fend for themselves, hoping to thrive or at least die with dignity, flooded this new land of freedom.  It was the first time in history that man was an individual, not a serf.  The ideal was to leave success and failure up to the individual, resulting in a country more amazing than anyone ever imagined.  America became the number one destination for any human with self-confidence and a dream.  Fortunes were made and fortunes were lost but the successes far outweighed the losses.  No where was the standard of living for the majority of the populace this high and growing.

So why wouldn't the rest of the world want to take on freedoms like the United States and offer all of their citizens the opportunity to be a self-sufficient individual member of society?  Because the old entrenched systems of authority knew handing that sort of power over to the masses would mean an end to their cushy positions.  They too would be flung into the race to fend for themselves, no longer riding the backs of the men they owned.

You see, our founding fathers were the first Marlon Perkins.  They respected, revered and had total faith in the abilities of man to survive without a keeper.  Not only did they believe man would survive in the atmosphere of freedom, they imagined man would thrive.  Freedom provides the ability to succeed and fail on one's own, two of the most precious experiences any human can have.  These are the very two experiences a person like George "Sorrows" Black wants to take away from us all.  He has no faith in the individual to conduct their own lives in a free society.  He much prefers us all to reside in his crumby little petting zoo where he can watch us, feed us at prescribed times, keeping him amused and fulfilled, knowing he rules over all the dumb, incompetent creatures of the Big Schwartz Sorosful Kingdom.

Time will tell if Mr. Sorrows will corral the people of the United States.  He's got quite a few eating from his trough already but I believe the wild independent animals still outnumber the dependent progressive menagerie of pets Schwartzie has in his pen.

Word to the herd...bite this hand that feeds you!